<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A couple of very good m-banking review articles</title>
	<link>http://jonathandonner.com/archives/41</link>
	<description>Most mobile telephones are in the developing world. Discussion &#038; research by Jonathan Donner.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: jdonner</title>
		<link>http://jonathandonner.com/archives/41#comment-1923</link>
		<author>jdonner</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jonathandonner.com/archives/41#comment-1923</guid>
		<description>Hi Karthik,
One way to look at things is to distinguish between an m-banking service's  technological solution---for example (a) GPRS/mobile web vs. (b) SIM-based menus or (c) SMS---and its financial services solution, which could be(1) serving customers who have active bank accounts (2) opening ‘new’ bank accounts for customers when they sign up or (3) serving customers without bank accounts, where the operator or some third party holds the stored value.

Each m-banking service combines a technological solution and a financial services solution. mChek combines a technological solution of (b) SIM-based application plus a financial solution of (1) serving customers with preexisting credit cards.  

Each combination has advantages and disadvantages, vis-a-vis security, scalability, interoperability, ease-of-use, etc. , and depends on the players in the marketplace and the laws governing telecom and banking in each country. 

The enthusiasm in the economic development community is focused around using m-banking to provide access to people who currently do not have a bank account—the ‘unbanked’. So in that sense, services which run on simple/inexpensive phones are attractive because they have more reach into low-income communities.  Some think that the best way to do this is to have banks as partners, thus giving people bank accounts they access exclusively via the mobile channel. Others look to third-party or operator-led models where 'unbanked' users get access to payments, transfers and stored value functionality without opening an actual banking account.  Only time will tell which model(s) will prove most successful at bringing financial services to the unbanked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Karthik,<br />
One way to look at things is to distinguish between an m-banking service&#8217;s  technological solution&#8212;for example (a) GPRS/mobile web vs. (b) SIM-based menus or (c) SMS&#8212;and its financial services solution, which could be(1) serving customers who have active bank accounts (2) opening ‘new’ bank accounts for customers when they sign up or (3) serving customers without bank accounts, where the operator or some third party holds the stored value.</p>
<p>Each m-banking service combines a technological solution and a financial services solution. mChek combines a technological solution of (b) SIM-based application plus a financial solution of (1) serving customers with preexisting credit cards.  </p>
<p>Each combination has advantages and disadvantages, vis-a-vis security, scalability, interoperability, ease-of-use, etc. , and depends on the players in the marketplace and the laws governing telecom and banking in each country. </p>
<p>The enthusiasm in the economic development community is focused around using m-banking to provide access to people who currently do not have a bank account—the ‘unbanked’. So in that sense, services which run on simple/inexpensive phones are attractive because they have more reach into low-income communities.  Some think that the best way to do this is to have banks as partners, thus giving people bank accounts they access exclusively via the mobile channel. Others look to third-party or operator-led models where &#8216;unbanked&#8217; users get access to payments, transfers and stored value functionality without opening an actual banking account.  Only time will tell which model(s) will prove most successful at bringing financial services to the unbanked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karthick</title>
		<link>http://jonathandonner.com/archives/41#comment-1915</link>
		<author>Karthick</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jonathandonner.com/archives/41#comment-1915</guid>
		<description>Mobile banking is really taking off and in India, we have mchek.com which does amazing service and very easy to use also.
Many of friends have used mchek and they find it extremely useful and easy. But, in India, GPRS users are minority and hence SMS based m-banking had found its way. Is this sustainable/scalable or is security good enough for banking?
But, if more users start using internet on mobile, then, these kind of services wont be neccessary since users might go to bank's website and do transactions. What do you think?
PS:I query is not totally relevant to the post, btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mobile banking is really taking off and in India, we have mchek.com which does amazing service and very easy to use also.<br />
Many of friends have used mchek and they find it extremely useful and easy. But, in India, GPRS users are minority and hence SMS based m-banking had found its way. Is this sustainable/scalable or is security good enough for banking?<br />
But, if more users start using internet on mobile, then, these kind of services wont be neccessary since users might go to bank&#8217;s website and do transactions. What do you think?<br />
PS:I query is not totally relevant to the post, btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
